home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- INFO-HAMS Digest Thu, 26 Oct 89 Volume 89 : Issue 807
-
- Today's Topics:
- ARRL 80: PART 97 & STATION I.D.
- best deals on equipment?
- callsign database????
- Earthquake in SF!!!
- Field Day... OK... A proposal:
- How Much Good Does Ham Radio "Emergency Preparedness" Do?
- info on Crystal Radio kit or schematic
- PL259 connector assembly
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Oct 89 23:19:50 GMT
- From: shelby!portia!jessica!paulf@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Paul Flaherty)
- Subject: ARRL 80: PART 97 & STATION I.D.
-
- In article <6870@hubcap.clemson.edu> bjb@hubcap.clemson.edu (BJ Backitis ) writes:
- >If operating a club station, such as WD4EOG (Clemson Univ. ARC), how
- >does operating as control operator work? If I sign as WD4EOG, are my
- >privileges limited to my OWN call (and do I need to give my own call
- >in that case), or those of the station trustee? Or should club calls
- >only be given as information, to tell the station you are operating,
- >but officially id-ing using your own call...
-
- If you are fortunate enough to have a club call, here's how it works:
-
- 1. The privileges of the club license are those of the trustee; for
- example, the trustee of W6YX is W2FRT, who has an advanced class license,
- so W6YX has advanced class privileges.
-
- 2. If an operator has a license with privileges greater than the club
- license, s/he must include his/her call along with the club call when
- using privileges greater than the club license. For example, if WD8OML,
- an extra class licensee, wants to operate phone on 21.220, he must sign
- as "WD8OML operating W6YX".
-
- 3. Operators are limited to the privileges of their licenses, except when
- a control operator of greater privilege is present, at which time the
- "lesser" operator effectively becomes a third party, capable of using
- the control operator's privileges.
-
- 4. Finally, operators may use their own calls, operating portable. Some
- clubs (like W6YX) prohibit this.
-
-
- Caveat - I am not a lawyer. Nor would I want to be one.
-
-
- -=Paul Flaherty, N9FZX | "I asked for a dissertation topic, and for my
- ->paulf@shasta.Stanford.EDU | sins, they gave me one."
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 03:25:50 GMT
- From: att!cbnewsh!ron@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (ron.saad)
- Subject: best deals on equipment?
-
- Hi.
-
- I'm planning a trip that includes stops in Taiwan, Hong Kong and
- Japan and am wondering if this would be a good opportunity to overhaul
- the shack.
-
- Anyone have information on where the best prices are (compared to
- locally in the US) ?
- How about detailed info on duty rates for ham radio and general computer
- and electronic equipment ?
- Does it pay to buy there and schlep it back ?
-
- Please respond by email and I will summarize.
-
- Oh yeah - assuming it all works out I'll be going in a couple of weeks,
- so if you have any info for me, don't wait too long ...
-
- Thanks much,
- 73 de
- --
- Ron Saad - WF2K ...!att!feathers!ron
- ron@feathers.ATT.COM
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 00:37:35 GMT
- From: pilchuck!ssc!tad@uunet.uu.net (Tad Cook)
- Subject: callsign database????
-
- James Washer asked if there was a way of finding out about ham
- calls before they arrive from the FCC.
-
- You might try calling 312-234-8011, with modem set for 1200 bps
- and 8 bits, 1 stop bit and VT-102 emulation. This is a free
- service from the Callbook that lists any new or updated info
- that is not in the current Callbook or Callbook Supplement.
-
- The info is only put in a couple of times per month, so it may
- be possible to receive a license before it appears here.
-
- It is useful for QSLing someone who is not yet in the book, or
- who has changed addresses and the current book doesn't show it
- yet.
-
- 73,
- Tad Cook
- tad@ssc.UUCP
- KT7H @ N7HFZ
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 00:48:45 GMT
- From: pyramid!leadsv!esl!esl.ESL.COM!dml@decwrl.dec.com (Denis Lynch)
- Subject: Earthquake in SF!!!
-
- I forgot one significant point in my last posting: by the weekend the
- "old reliable" trained folks were *BURNED OUT*. They were therefore
- getting over-involved, over-long-winded etc.
-
- *If* they had had adequate backup of well-trained workers, they could
- have gotten some sleep, and things would have sounded a bit cleaner.
-
- One more reason for a trained corp. I hate to think what things would
- sound like if this had been a *really* big one. With so few skilled
- communicators, the good ones from the whole area would have gotten
- burned out! There would be much more communication needed because
- standard facilities would be longer in coming back, and a wider area
- would need ongoing operations. (As it was, areas like Cupertino, Sunnyvale,
- Mountain View, Palo Alto, etc. were able to make resources available to
- harder-hit areas like Los Gatos and Santa Cruz.) On the flip side, I guess,
- fewer of us would have had to be back at work!
-
- I also forgot to add to my last posting
- 73, Denis N2TI
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 00:11:00 GMT
- From: mirror!frog!john@CS.BU.EDU (John Woods)
- Subject: Field Day... OK... A proposal:
-
- [I've re-ordered the points he made to rebut in a more logical order]
-
- In article <7880084@hpfcdc.HP.COM>, perry@hpfcdc.HP.COM (Perry Scott) writes:
- > I've only participated in one field day. As an outsider, it seemed
- > strange that field day was:
- > o you get points for putting out marginal signal (sorry QRPers) that
- > hardly anyone can hear.
- If you are running from a 2KW generator, you can run one 1KW station or
- 10 100W stations. When your generator runs out of gas, solar power will
- let you run a QRP station--period. If you can't communicate with one tube
- tied behind your back, how are you going to manage when Nature ties it there
- for you?
-
- > o home stations are frowned upon. (In a real emergency, we all run to
- > the nearest mountaintop, where the emergency isn't ?)
-
- Many classes of emergencies happen away from populated areas (forest fires,
- plane crashes, etc.). Knowing how to set up a field station is valuable.
- Moreover, consider the damage from Hugo (or the REAL "big one" when it
- finally hits San Francisco) -- there may not *be* any homes left to have
- a nice, cozy station in.
-
- > o the antenna systems and radios are usually commercially-made.
- > (real hams roll their own stuff, right ?)
-
- Perhaps Field Day needs a new category for radios soldered together out of
- junk television parts the morning of Field Day (I'm not quite kidding).
- However, for emergency preparedness, simply having spare radios in a safe
- corner of the local ham club is more likely to be a winner than secreting
- broken TV sets around the local area... :-) (Note that one antenna
- I used during a Field Day was a 1000' chunk of wire thrown down the
- side of the mountaintop we were at. It may not have been the most
- efficient possible antenna, but it worked *real* well. I suppose the
- WIRE was commercially-made, but...)
- >
- > o done in the summer. (no emergencies happen in the winter, right ?)
- > o the exact start and stop time are known. (planned emergencies ?)
-
- Hey, real disaster-relief agencies plan their simulations ahead of time!
- (Ah, I remember the time someone got up at the BEARS club and announced
- "There will be a disaster at the beginning of next month...") However,
- there has been a proposal kicking around rec.ham-radio for a spontaneous
- Field-Day-like thing, which might be a very interesting idea.
-
- > o more social event than communications (we hams do like to yak...)
-
- What, you should get an extra multiplier if you didn't enjoy yourself?
- Most hams do it because it IS a fun hobby -- the ability to be useful
- once in a while is gravy.
-
- Field Day is not a carefully designed emergency preparedness exercise.
- However, when a disaster does hit, a lot of FD operators will be able
- to think "Well, gee, now what do I do?", and somewhere, in the dim dark
- recesses of their brains, the training Field Day and other contests gives
- them will nudge forward and help out.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 25 Oct 89 21:53:21 GMT
- From: pyramid!leadsv!esl!esl.ESL.COM!dml@decwrl.dec.com (Denis Lynch)
- Subject: How Much Good Does Ham Radio "Emergency Preparedness" Do?
-
- Just to add one point to Steve's excellent observations: I'll bet you
- didn't start hearing the "overhead" communications until the real
- "emergency" situation was over. Because you probably weren't listening
- in the first hour or two.
-
- My experience with the earthquake disaster here was that by the weekend,
- much of the communication was ham radio logistics rather than real
- emergency traffic. But that isn't our fault, really. The main reason for
- this was that the Red Cross etc. were able to ask for (and get) all the
- support they wanted from us, even if they didn't really need it. That's
- probably the way we want it to be: we want them to always want to come
- to us, not to hesitate because we might get uppity or cut them off later.
-
- In contrast, *all* the traffic I heard in the first couple of hours had to
- do directly with the emergency, and was extremely well organized and
- coordinated. All of Steve's points apply to what I heard.
-
- Sure we got help from everybody with a radio, and that's great. But it only
- worked because there were people who knew what to tell them to do. And they
- didn't all come out Tuesday nigth!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 01:26:08 GMT
- From: zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!sequent!ccssrv!sterling@uunet.uu.net (Sterling Huxley)
- Subject: info on Crystal Radio kit or schematic
-
- As a Christmas present I thought I would give my nephew a crystal radio kit.
- I've looked around and can only find a cheap kit from Radio Shack.
- I haven't been able to find any schematics either.
-
- Does anyone know where a reasonable kit can be purchased?
- Or, a reference to a schematic might help.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Sterling Huxley
- ...!tektronix!sequent!ccssrv!sterling
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 26 Oct 89 01:01:31 GMT
- From: pyramid!leadsv!esl!esl.ESL.COM!dml@decwrl.dec.com (Denis Lynch)
- Subject: PL259 connector assembly
-
- There was a series in Hints and Kinks in QST a year or so ago on this
- very subject.
-
- The keys I've seen missed in this discussion are:
- Use a BIG soldering iron (100W or so). That gets the connector heated up
- without taking so long that the cable melts.
-
- PL259's are not intended to be re-used. You can get them cheap enough
- that is really isn't worth the trouble. (Obviously this means going to
- hamfests, flea markets, surplus stores/catalogs etc. But you should be
- able to get a PL259 for under a dollar. Why fool around with re-using
- it at that price? Just cut the sucker off and start over.)
-
- 73, Denis N2TI
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of INFO-HAMS Digest V89 Issue #807
- **************************************
-